Mejores prácticas para tratar con archivos no elaborados en una instalación nueva de homebrew

Accidentalmente borré /usr/local/binel que contenía brewentre otras cosas. Reinstalé homebrew y corrí brew prunepara deshacerme de los enlaces simbólicos rotos, pero cuando ejecuto brew doctor, sigo recibiendo la siguiente advertencia:

$ brew doctor
Warning: Unbrewed dylibs were found in /usr/local/lib.
If you didn't put them there on purpose they could cause problems when
building Homebrew formulae, and may need to be deleted.

Unexpected dylibs:
    /usr/local/lib/libtcl8.6.dylib
    /usr/local/lib/libtk8.6.dylib
Warning: Unbrewed header files were found in /usr/local/include.
If you didn't put them there on purpose they could cause problems when
building Homebrew formulae, and may need to be deleted.

Unexpected header files:
    /usr/local/include/fakemysql.h
    /usr/local/include/fakepq.h
    /usr/local/include/fakesql.h
    ...
Warning: Unbrewed .pc files were found in /usr/local/lib/pkgconfig.
If you didn't put them there on purpose they could cause problems when
building Homebrew formulae, and may need to be deleted.

Unexpected .pc files:
    /usr/local/lib/pkgconfig/tcl.pc
    /usr/local/lib/pkgconfig/tk.pc
Warning: Unbrewed static libraries were found in /usr/local/lib.
If you didn't put them there on purpose they could cause problems when
building Homebrew formulae, and may need to be deleted.

Unexpected static libraries:
    /usr/local/lib/libtclstub8.6.a
    /usr/local/lib/libtkstub8.6.a
Warning: You have uncommitted modifications to Homebrew
If this a surprise to you, then you should stash these modifications.
Stashing returns Homebrew to a pristine state but can be undone
should you later need to do so for some reason.
    cd /usr/local/Library && git stash && git clean -d -f

Si desea ver la lista completa, consulte aquí: http://pastie.org/9663902

Mi pregunta es, ¿debo eliminar manualmente estos archivos? De acuerdo con esta respuesta , simplemente puedo dejar los archivos (o moverlos a una carpeta separada y luego ejecutarlos, brew link <folder name>pero dado que esa respuesta tiene tres años (y sobre binarios específicamente), estoy comprobando si hay una táctica más correcta.

Respuestas (1)

En su mayor parte, se pueden ignorar de forma segura a menos que haya un problema con el software adicional que no se instala. Según este comentario de uno de los desarrolladores. El brew doctorcomando está en gran medida solo como un medio para solucionar problemas.